2. CE Marking and the 2023/1230 Transition
Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC is being progressively replaced by Regulation (EU) 2023/1230, which entered into force in July 2023 with the bulk of its provisions applying from January 2027. Until the applicable date, manufacturers can generally still place machinery on the market under the existing Directive, but the transition period is not indefinite and the two frameworks are not identical — the Regulation adds explicit cybersecurity and digital-instructions provisions that the Directive does not cover. Which framework applies to a specific product, and from which date, depends on the machine category, the national transposition, and the timing of your conformity assessment. Confirm the current applicable framework for your specific product with a notified body or the relevant national market surveillance authority before finalizing a technical file — do not rely on a blog post to make that determination.
Whichever framework applies, the technical construction file follows the same logic: a general description of the machinery, assembly and circuit drawings, design calculations, the risk assessment, the list of harmonized standards applied, test reports, a copy of the instructions, and the signed Declaration of Conformity. The file must be retrievable — not necessarily printed — and kept available to authorities for a defined retention period after the machine's last unit is placed on the market.
3. Risk Assessment Under EN ISO 12100: The Document Everything Else Depends On
EN ISO 12100 is not a single form — it is an iterative method: determine the machine's limits, identify hazards at each phase of its life cycle (transport, installation, operation, maintenance, decommissioning), estimate and evaluate the risk, then apply protective measures in a fixed hierarchy: eliminate the hazard by design first, add safeguarding second, warn and instruct last. The output that auditors expect to see is not a narrative but a traceable record: each hazard linked to a risk estimate, a chosen measure, and a residual risk. Machinery Directive and Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 both treat this risk assessment as the foundation the rest of the technical file is built on — get it wrong or leave it thin, and every downstream document (the Declaration, the manual's warning labels, the guarding drawings) inherits the gap.
4. Instructions and Manuals: Where Compliance Meets the End User
Machinery placed on a national market generally needs instructions in a language understood in that market — not just the manufacturer's language of choice. For manufacturers exporting to a dozen countries, that means a dozen controlled translations of the same technical manual, each of which needs to stay synchronized when the machine is revised. This is the document set most likely to drift: a design change updates the drawings and the risk assessment, but the translated manuals lag behind, sometimes for years, until an audit or an incident forces a reconciliation. Structuring manuals modularly — separating safety warnings, maintenance procedures, and spare-parts lists into sections that can be updated and re-translated independently — reduces how much has to be redone each time. Our broader library on maintenance documentation and technical manual structure covers this in more depth for teams building or rebuilding a manual system from scratch.
Common Mistakes We See in General Machinery Documentation
- Treating the ISO 9001 certificate as proof of CE compliance, or vice versa — they answer different questions and neither substitutes for the other.
- Writing a risk assessment once at product launch and never revisiting it after a design change, a new accessory option, or a reported near-miss.
- Letting translated manuals fall out of sync with the current design revision, especially for lower-volume export markets.
- Keeping the technical construction file as a folder of loose files with no version control, so nobody can say with confidence which risk assessment matches which serial-number range.
- Assuming the transition from 2006/42/EC to Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 is automatic and uniform, rather than checking the specific applicable date and category for the product in question.
- Storing the Declaration of Conformity separately from the evidence that supports it, so retrieving proof during a market surveillance request takes days instead of minutes.
Find the Right Document in Seconds, Not Hours
Igera's AI reads your own QMS records, risk assessments, technical files, and manuals — then answers questions in plain language and cites the exact source document and clause. No guessing which file has the current risk assessment.
See How It Works
Frequently Asked Questions
Does ISO 9001 certification mean my machinery is automatically CE compliant?
No. ISO 9001 certifies that your quality management processes are documented and followed consistently; it says nothing about whether a specific machine meets the essential health and safety requirements for CE marking. The two certifications are complementary but assessed independently, and one being in place does not imply the other.
Is the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC still valid, or must I already comply with Regulation (EU) 2023/1230?
Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 is progressively replacing the Directive, with the bulk of its provisions taking effect from January 2027 and a transition period in between. Which framework applies to your product right now depends on its category and the specific dates set out in the Regulation. Confirm your product's applicable framework with a notified body or your national market surveillance authority rather than assuming.
Who is qualified to carry out a risk assessment under EN ISO 12100?
The standard does not mandate a specific external certification, but it does require the assessment to be carried out by people with genuine knowledge of the machine's design, its intended use, and reasonably foreseeable misuse — typically a cross-functional team including design engineering and, for higher-risk machinery, an external safety specialist. Self-assessment by someone unfamiliar with the machine's failure modes is a common source of weak documentation.
Do I need a separate technical manual for every export market?
You need instructions in a language understood in each market where the machine is placed, which in practice usually means a separate translated version per destination country or language group. The underlying technical content — procedures, diagrams, warnings — can be shared across versions if you manage translation through a controlled, modular process.
Can the technical construction file be kept purely in electronic form?
Generally yes — both the Directive and the Regulation focus on the file being retrievable and available to authorities within a reasonable timeframe, not on it being printed. What matters is that it is complete, current, and that someone in your organization can produce it quickly when asked.
How often should the risk assessment be reviewed?
There is no fixed universal interval, but good practice is to revisit it whenever the design changes, a new accessory or configuration is introduced, an incident or near-miss is reported, or a relevant harmonized standard is revised. Treating it as a living document rather than a one-time deliverable is the difference auditors notice most.
What happens if my documentation is incomplete during a market surveillance inspection?
Consequences vary by jurisdiction and severity, ranging from a formal request to complete the file within a set period to a sales restriction or withdrawal of the product from the market if the gaps affect safety. Exact procedures and penalties are set by national authorities, so this is a question to raise directly with your notified body or legal counsel rather than something to estimate in advance.
Disclaimer: This article is informational and does not constitute legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Requirements under the Machinery Directive, Regulation (EU) 2023/1230, ISO 9001, and EN ISO 12100 vary by product category, jurisdiction, and applicable transition dates. Confirm the specifics for your machinery with a qualified compliance professional, your notified body, or the relevant national regulator before making design or documentation decisions.
Editorial note: Last updated September 2026. Reviewed by the Igera Industrial Compliance Committee.
